Flute key marks and makersAs our researches into the old flutes continue, we come across flutes that have interesting and maybe meaningful markings underneath their keys. These marks seem to take several forms:
It may prove valuable to researchers to record somewhere whenever these marks are found - after some time a pattern may emerge. This is such a place. Please feel free to let me know whenever you come across such a marking, and I'll add it to the list. Keys marked "A·L"According to the NLI, Alexander Liddle flourished in London from 1847 to 79. He was listed as a "Wind Musical Instrument Maker" and employed the marks "Liddle, London" and "A·L". So far, these makers have employed keys stamped "A·L": |
| Maker | Owned/Reported by: |
| Metzler | Terry McGee |
| Butler | Marc Löfgren |
| Moon (cylindrical 8-key) | Terry McGee |
|
Now since not all A·L keyed flutes have the numerical marks, does this lend support to the Liddle as key-maker theory?
|
Keys marked "RR"Rudall & Rose were the most prestigious makers in the first half of the 19th century. In most cases, as far as we know, the underside of their keys were not marked. I'm indebted to Lawrence Mallette for the image shown of the underside of three keys from his RR no 4256. Assuming the same stamp was used for each (but not totally successfully aligned) the stamp is RR. |
|
| Maker | Owned/Reported by: |
| Rudall & Rose | Lawrence Mallette |
|
An interesting question arises - were these:
and, in any case, why were the other keys not similarly stamped? Keys marked CThe C# touch on my Geo Rudall, Willis Fecit flute is neatly stamped with a capital C.
|
| C and C# foot keys from an unmarked flute resembling a
Wylde.
Note the F mark under one touch, and the four slashes on both shafts. |
This C# key touch bears a neatly marked M - the flute
itself marked Butler, Dublin, but in a curiously unsophisticated
manner! Thanks to Lawrence Mallette.
|
|
|
Keys marked "I·N"The New Langwill Index doesn't list any maker that fits into the initials I.N. - a plausible suggestion is that I.N. was a silversmith keymaker and not a flute maker. "I" often stands for "J" - eg the mark I·HALE for John Hale - but still no one obvious with those initals. It may occur to you that it could be N·I rather than I·N, however note that the letter N in Times Roman has no seraph at the bottom of the oblique line. Ciarán Somers reports the example below, on a flute stamped "George & Manby". Again, the NLI makes no reference to George or Manby. Ciarán reports having seen the inscription on flutes by Rudall & Rose, and seeing a Rudall & Rose also stamped George & Manby. It is possible that they were a music dealership in Fleet Street.
|
|
Once again a mark under the C# foot key, once more the period up at waist level like a decimal point. Daryl King provided us with the image shown. Is it possible that this is a fuller version of the "F" discussed above? Again the I could be a J. There are no London flutemakers with initials I.F., but there are a few with J.F. |
![]() |
| Maker | Owned/Reported by: |
| Blackman | Daryl King |
The NLI advises that Henry Wylde flourished London 1832 -
82. He was earlier with Rudall & Rose, and is listed from 1835
as a Flute Maker.
| Maker | Owned/Reported by: |
| Pask | Terry McGee |
|
So the question here is - did Wylde make the flute or just the keys? And notice that Wylde appears in the entry on I.N, but this time as the maker, not the marking!
Keys with Numerical Marks
Many flutes have under-key marks which may at times appear to be Roman
Numerals, at other times perhaps emblems. We may be able to deduce
the meaning of these marks once we see the range of marks in use. |
| Maker | Key-Mark | Wood-Mark | Owned/Reported by: |
| William Hall | \/||| | - | Michael Stone / Terry McGee |
| Butler | ||| | - | Marc Löfgren |
| German Flute | \\\/ | \/// & \\\/ | Madeleine Rowles / Terry McGee |
| German Flute | \/||| | \/||| | Chris Caton |
| Unmarked Wylde-like | //// | - | Private UK Collector |
|
Non-matching marksHmmm, slip-up or what? The Rowles German flute above has:
|
![]() |
This seems to cast doubt on the Roman numeral theory as \\V is not a valid number in Latin. But is \\\/ the same as \///, or were these keys fitted to the wrong flute? Or is it significant that the markings are mirror images of each other?
A bit too early to jump to conclusions - we're going to have to assemble a lot more data. So pop those pesky keys off your old flute and look underneath, and let us know what you find. My thanks to those above who did!
Back to McGee-Flutes Home Page